A Manifestation of Impression Management in Corporate Reporting in Jse Top 40 Listed Companies
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study is to exposes impression management in the developing country, with a specific focus on the Top 40 Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). Despite not being required by the International Financial Reporting Standards, the Chairperson's statement is the most read statement among the more than 80% of listed companies. The study investigated profitable and unprofitable companies' use of impression management through passive voice and personal references.
Methodology: Secondary data in form of annual reports were used and self-attribution theory was used as framework. Mixed content analysis was used. Using a targeted sample, the study differentiated between 20 profitable and 20 unprofitable companies, based on the change in pre-tax profit between fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020.
Findings: Profitable and unprofitable companies used self-attribution bias. The Mann-Whitney test finds no significant difference despite profitable organizations’ using more self-attribution than unprofitable companies. The continued use of impression management deceives investors and impairs their ability to make informed decisions
Implications: The study sends a strong warning to potential investors on use of impression management by listed companies. Further, the study further adds to the debate on impression management through self-attribution in corporate reporting.
Downloads
Article Analytics Summary
References
Aerts, W. (2005). Picking up the pieces: impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes. Accounting, organizations and society, 30(6), 493-517.
Ahmed, I. U., & Salat, A. (2019). A thematic analysis of Chairman’s Statement of the Commercial Banks of Bangladesh. BARISHAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL (PART-3), 37.
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Bowen, R. M., Davis, A. K., & Matsumoto, D. A. (2005). Emphasis on pro forma versus GAAP earnings in quarterly press releases: Determinants, SEC intervention, and market reactions. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1011-1038.
Brennan, N. M., & Merkl-Davies, D. M. (2013). Accounting narratives and impression management. In The Routledge companion to accounting communication (pp. 123-146). Routledge.
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Impression management in sustainability reports: An empirical investigation of the use of graphs. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1), 16-37.
Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2008). The mixed methods reader. Sage.
Clatworthy, M., & Jones, M. J. (2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3),311-326.
Clatworthy, M. A., & Jones, M. J. (2006). Differential patterns of textual characteristics and company performance in the chairman's statement. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4),493-511.
Demaline, C. (2020). Disclosure readability of firms investigated for books-and-records infractions: An impression management perspective. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(10),131-145.
Goffman, E. (1949). Presentation of self in everyday life. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 6-7.
Lange, D., & Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of management review, 37(2), 300-326.
Lee, T. H. (2017). The status of corporate social responsibility research in public relations: A content analysis of published articles in eleven scholarly journals from 1980 to 2015. Public Relations Review, 43(1), 211-218.
Leung, S., Parker, L., & Courtis, J. (2015). Impression management through minimal narrative disclosure in annual reports. The British accounting review, 47(3), 275-289.
Melloni, G., Stacchezzini, R., & Lai, A. (2016). The tone of business model disclosure: an impression management analysis of the integrated reports. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(2), 295-320.
Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: incremental information or impression management? Journal of accounting literature, 26, 116-196.
Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: new insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and business research, 41(5), 415-437.
Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Koller, V. (2012). ‘Metaphoring’people out of this world: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a chairman's statement of a UK defence firm. Accounting Forum,
Merkl‐Davies, D. M., Brennan, N. M., & McLeay, S. J. (2011). Impression management and retrospective sense‐making in corporate narratives: A social psychology perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(3), 315-344.
Moreno, A., Jones, M. J., & Quinn, M. (2019). A longitudinal study of the textual characteristics in the chairman’s statements of Guinness: An impression management perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(6), 1714-1741.
Nxumalo, L. K. (2020). Investigating a South African listed company’s corporate social responsibility initiatives in varying economic conditions
Nyahas, S. I., Ntayi, J. M., Kamukama, N., & Munene, J. (2018). Stakeholders influence on voluntary disclosure practices by listed companies in Nigeria: An investigation of managers’ perception. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(2),267-283.
Ogden, S., & Clarke, J. (2005). Customer disclosures, impression management and the construction of legitimacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3),313-345.
Osma, B. G., & Guillamón-Saorín, E. (2011). Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases. Accounting, organizations and society, 36(4-5), 187-208.
Padayachee, N. K. D. (2010). The application and relevance of spiritual leadership in the JSE top 40 companies University of Pretoria].
Phesa, M., Khumalo, Q. P., & Sibanda, M. (2021, 1-3 December 2021). Impression Management Examination in Chairpersons’ Statements in the Top 40 JSE Listed Companies. Mbali Conference 2021 Proceedings, University of Zululand.
Provis, C. (2010). The ethics of impression management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(2), 199-212.
Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2016). The HRM process approach: The influence of employees’ attribution to explain the HRM‐performance relationship. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 201-217.
Smith, M., Jamil, A., Johari, Y. C., & Ahmad, S. A. (2006). The chairman's statement in Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 14(49-65).
Stainbank, L., & Peebles, C. (2006). The usefulness of corporate annual reports in South Africa: perceptions of preparers and users. Meditari Accountancy Research, 14(1), 15-35.
Story, J., & Neves, P. (2015). When corporate social responsibility (CSR) increases performance: exploring the role of intrinsic and extrinsic CSR attribution. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 111-124.
Wang, J. (2016). Literature review on the impression management in corporate information disclosure. Modern Economy, 7(6), 725-731.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55(1), 22-45.
Wilson, J. (2014). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project. Sage.
Yasseen, Y., Moola-Yasseen, M., & Padia, N. (2017). A preliminary study into impression management practices in chairman’s statements in South African annual reports: An attribution theory perspective. Communicare: Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa, 36(1), 47-66.
Yuthas, K., Rogers, R., & Dillard, J. F. (2002). Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1), 141-157.
Copyright (c) 2022 Masibulele Phesa, Mabutho Sibanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
CSRC Publishing and JBSEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors submitting and publishing in JBSEE agree to the copyright policy under creative common license 4.0 (Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International). Under this license, the authors published in JBSEE retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. All other authors using the content of SBSEE are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JBSEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
