Identification and Protection of Corporate Whistle-blowers: A Legal Perspective
Abstract
Purpose: Internal audit, management review, and account reconciliation are popular tools for combating corporate fraud, but whistle-blowing is the most prevalent. Whistle-blowers frequently fear reprisal from coworkers and bosses. That is why they require protection and support. Many international organizations have advocated that countries adopt regulatory frameworks for protecting whistle-blowers. Therefore, the current study investigates the notion of whistle-blowing to compare it to Public Interest Disclosure Act 2017 of Pakistan, which was enacted. It identifies the influence of legal and ethical cultural norms in organizations on whistle-blowing behaviour.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Qualitative method was used to analyze statutes, local and international protocols, rules and regulations of Pakistan and developed countries.
Findings: The results suggest that the development of legal and ethical culture in a business may inspire whistle-blowing, and whistle-blowers may feel psychologically safe when reporting wrongdoings. Further, whistle-blowers must be legally supported and encouraged to function as corporate monitors, discouraging wrongdoers to the point of elimination.
Implications/Originality/Value: It is suggested that the Act be revised to address the existed flaws. The Act is specifically amended to cover private-sector whistle-blowers, and an impartial, external reporting channel is established under one of the existing specialized organizations that deal with fraud. In particular, anti-corruption bodies, like National Accountability Bureau, has established as an external reporting and investigative channel.
Downloads
Article Analytics Summary
References
ACFE (2016), Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse – 2016 Global Fraud Study, ACFE, available at: www.acfe.com/rttn2016.aspx
Ahmed, S. Z. (2016). A critical examination of regulating and monitoring conflict of interest perspective in Pakistan. Applied Research Journal, 2(3), 97–103.
Ali, W., Wilson, J., & Husnain, M. (2022). Determinants/motivations of corporate social responsibility disclosure in developing economies: A survey of the extant literature. Sustainability, 14(6), 3474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063474
Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2012.12.003
Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2012). What is government transparency. QoG Working Paper Series, 2012(16), 16.
Breznau, N. (2021). The welfare state and risk perceptions: The novel Coronavirus pandemic and public concern in 70 countries. European Societies, 23(sup1), S33-S46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1793215
Cailleba, P., & Petit, S. C. (2018). The whistle-blower as the personification of a moral and managerial paradox. Management, 21(1), 675. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.211.0675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.211.0675
Chalouat, I., Carrión-Crespo, C., & Licata, M. (2019). Law and practice on protecting whistle-blowers in the public and financial services sectors (Vol. 1978, Issue 151).
Farooqi, S., Abid, G., & Ahmed, A. (2017). How bad it is to be good: Impact of organizational ethical culture on whistle-blowing (the ethical partners). Arab Economic and Business Journal, 12(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31270.88647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2017.06.001
Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistle-blowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1), 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005922701763
Khan, K. I., Saleem, S., Sheeraz, M., & Imtiaz, U. (2021). Breaking silence and improving performance: how subordinates feeling trusted, and loyalty towards supervisors mediates the relationship between ethical leadership and project team members' silence. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1-18.
Kimbro, M. B. (2002). A cross-country empirical investigation of corruption and its relationship to economic, cultural, and monitoring institutions: An examination of the role of accounting and financial statements quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(4), 325-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0201700403
Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 245-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.487403
Lavena, C. F. (2016). Whistle-blowing: Individual and organizational determinants of the decision to report wrongdoing in the federal government. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 113-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014535241
Lewis, D. (2022). Retaliation for whistle-blowing: Some case studies on the experience of re-employment/redeployment. International Journal of Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-10-2021-0244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-10-2021-0244
Mata, M. N., Khan F. H., Khan, K. I., Martins, J. N., Rita, J. M., & Dantas, R. M. (2021). Team diversity and project performance: Role of trust and absorptive capacity in IT Industry, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2S), 1-20.
Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2002). What makes whistle-blowers effective? Three field studies. Human relations, 55(4), 455-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055004463
Miethe, T. D., & Rothschild, J. (1994). Whistle-blowing and the control of organizational misconduct. Sociological Inquiry, 64(3), 322-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1994.tb00395.x
O’Dowd, A., Hayes, J., & Cohen, D. (2010). Whistle while you work. BMJ (Online), 340(7756), 1110–1113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2350
O’Higgins, E. R. (2006). Corruption, underdevelopment, and extractive resource industries: Addressing the vicious cycle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 235-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1052150X00012823
Ogbu, S. U. (2017). Whistle blowing policy as a mechanism for energizing the ‘war against corruption’ in Nigeria. International Journal of International Relations, Media and Mass Communication Studies, 3(4), 16-32.
Richardson, B. K., & McGlynn, J. (2011). Rabid fans, death threats, and dysfunctional stakeholders: The influence of organizational and industry contexts on whistle-blowing cases. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 121-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910380344
Rothschild, J., & Miethe, T. D. (1999). Whistle-blower disclosures and management retaliation: The battle to control information about organization corruption. Work and occupations, 26(1), 107-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888499026001006
Salinger, L. M. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of white-collar & corporate crime (Vol. 1). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412914260
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith‐Crowe, K. (2008). 13 ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Academy of management Annals, 2(1), 545-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211677
Tricker, B., & Tricker, R. I. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA.
Vuong, Q. H., La, V. P., Nguyen, H. K. T., Ho, M. T., Vuong, T. T., & Ho, M. T. (2021). Identifying the moral–practical gaps in corporate social responsibility missions of Vietnamese firms: An event‐based analysis of sustainability feasibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 30-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2029
Wolfe, S., Worth, M., Dreyfus, S., & Brown, A. J. (2014). Whistle-blower protection rules in G20 countries: The next action plan. Melbourne: Transparency International Australia.
Copyright (c) 2022 Naheeda Ali, Kanwal Iqbal Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
CSRC Publishing and JAFEE adhere to Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. The authors, submitting and publishing in the Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies published by CSRC Publishing, retain the copyright of their work and give the journal right to publish their work agreeing to the licensing policy under Creative Common Attribution-Non Commercial (NC-BY-NC 4.0) International. Under this license, the published authors let others remix, tweak, and build upon their work non-commercially. Yet all the other authors using the content of CSRC Publishing are required to cite author(s), journal name and publisher in their work. CSRC Publishing and JAFEE follow an Open Access Policy for copyright and licensing.
